Judge Provide Outlines of Possible Fair Use Defense for Peer-to-Peer File Sharing

The Digital Media Lawyer Blog:  “Participants in the P2P world have long hoped that courts would recognize that at least some forms of file sharing constitute fair use. In a recent opinion in the Tenenbaum file-sharing case, Judge Gernter of the District of Massachusetts enumerated several unauthorized uses of copyrighted music thinks might constitute a fair use — including file-sharing under certain limited circumstances. While Judge Gertner’s opinions have limited precedential value, they may point to some pathways to legitimacy for the oft-maligned P2P industry.”

The case is Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, D. Mass., Memorandum and Order (Dec. 7, 2009).

The YouTube Approach to Copyright Infringement

Digital Media Lawyer Blog:  “YouTube has been amassing an impressive list of music industry giants who have agreed to license their content for performance on its site. Recent additions to the fold include Warner Music and the UK Performing Rights Society.  These are simply two more examples of the recent warming trend in the music and video copyright holding community’s attitude toward YouTube.  I recently attended a meeting of the California Copyright Conference which featured a panel appearance by Zahava Levine, YouTube’s knowledgeable and enthusiastic Chief Counsel.”

Installation of Modified Apple Software on Cloned Computers Constituted Copyright Infringement

Digital Media Lawyer Blog:  “There has been a lot of recent press touting manufacturers of MAC clones. Clone manufacturers attempt to unlock the tie between Apple software and hardware by selling non-Apple hardware that include copies of Apple’s much-loved software.   However, because Apple does not sell copies of its software separately from MAC hardware, the only way for this business to work economically is for the cloner to copy the MAC software and then download the software onto the clone.  This is an action that necessarily would seem to violate Apple’s rights to control the copying of its software.  And so found a court in a recent decision in favor of Apple. See Apple, Inc. v. Psystar Corp.”

First Sale Doctrine Protects Reseller of Promo CDs

Digital Media Lawyer Blog:  “Living on the west side of Los Angeles puts me smack in the middle of the entertainment industry.  I have often seen promotional copies of DVDs of TV shows and feature films or music CDs being exchanged at parties, and even seen stacks of these being left out by the side of the street for trash pickup.  Studios and labels don’t want this content distributed to the public because early distribution can foul up marketing campaigns, and because promotional versions of content may be remixed or reedited.  But can the studios and labels prevent recipients from giving away or even reselling these lightly-controlled promotional discs?  A June 2008 case said ‘No.’   The case is UMG Records, Inc. v. Augusto.”

Go to Top